Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Response #2: Comparing Trends: Twitter vs. The News


                Twitter is a widely used form of social media, where people can post statuses in 140 characters or less (known as tweets). Since its creation in 2006, Twitter has become one of the most popular and successful social networking services. It has over 140 million users and is the 8th most popular website in the world. It has had a tremendous impact on the way information is circulated, because tweets can reach a wide audience almost instantly. Twitter has changed its initial motto from “What are you doing now?” to “Share and discover what’s happening right now, anywhere in the world.” Analyzing the hashtags (#) of Twitter gives us an accurate depiction of its most popular trends. Things start to get interesting when one compares the trending topics on Twitter with national and world news headlines (from a reputable source, such as the New York Times and CNN). There are many differences and parallelisms between the two forms of media.  
            Looking at the news networks and newspapers, these more traditional forms of media have headlines that are more serious in nature.  As of June 23rd, headlines are mostly centered around the constant tension and unrest in the Middle East. The world section of the New York Times has articles on the state of democracy in Libya and Egypt, the residual effects of the Arab Spring. Articles such as “Libya Democracy Clashes With Fervor for Jihad” and “In Egypt, Declaration of Winner in Presidential Contest Is Said to Be Near” speak of these nations’ futures with uncertainty. Both the New York Times and CNN world sections have articles on the recent turmoil in Syria, caused by President al-Assad’s oppression. The CNN article, “Top Turkish officials in meetings after Syria downs Turkish jet,” analyzes the potential international crisis that has been brewing between these two independent nations.  There’s also a focus on China, with articles on the Chinese dissident, Ai Weiwei, and China’s space program eventually surpassing NASA.
            On the national scale, there’s a wider variety of topics that are more relevant in the lives of American citizens. Both outlets have articles on Obama’s and Romney’s Presidential campaigns. There is an article on whether or not Obama-care will be stopped by the Supreme Court. Another passage states that Penn State pedophile Jerry Sandusky is on suicide watch following his sentencing. On the lighter side, there’s a few articles covering the Miami Heat’s win in the 2012 NBA Finals.
            Based on the preceding news topics and headlines, we can see that legacy media news outlets focus their headlines on fairly serious topics.
            According to a long term study done by Pear Analytics, only 4% of tweets on Twitter are news-based. Regardless of that seemingly low number, many news outlets release headlines on Twitter, and many people rely on Twitter for news. A Journalism.org article stated that while the majority of top stories on legacy media were dedicated towards the Economy, the majority of news on Twitter was based on Middle Eastern unrest.
            Based on the preceding news topics and headlines, it is safe to assume that these articles are presented in an un-biased manner. In my opinion, the agenda of the legacy media is easier to identify than Twitter’s. There is a constant worry about an escalation of violence in the Middle East, a region that the United States polices. Along with the explosive growth of China, the objective here may be to strike fear into the hearts of the public, indirectly controlling them. The actions of Obama and Romney are being scrutinized due to the upcoming elections. The media’s increased focus on the President every four years is often criticized because it causes the executive politician in office to expedite the political agenda, getting things done as fast as possible while keeping their reputations as positive as possible. In my opinion, it is a shame that certain topics like campaign politics control all of the limelight from the more pressing issues.
            Looking at a new Twitter account I made (I have not followed anybody, altering my trends) on June 23rd, the global trends are much more sports and pop culture based. Hashtags with the words Laurent Blanc, Lionel Messi, Hackney Weekend, Greyson Michael Chance and Swedish House Mafia dominate. The only politically related hashtag is one containing Elena Valenciano, a former Spanish parliament member and a member of the Spanish Socialist Worker’s party. Laurent Blanc and Lionel Messi are both professional footballers (French and Argentine respectively); which is relevant due to the Eurocup taking place. Hackney Weekend is a major British music festival taking place soon. Greyson Michael Chance is a young boy on YouTube who covers famous songs. Swedish House Mafia is an electronic music group, who made headlines when they announced that they would be breaking up at the end of their next tour. The most popular U.S. Twitter trends are mostly meaningless conversation topics (#stillup, #OFTrivia, #SomethingIgetalot etc.). Not surprisingly, Hashtag Syria is on the list.
            In my opinion, Twitter’s agenda is the same as any other social media entity’s, to get people to act as social as possible. This drives Twitter’s revenue. Compared to Legacy Media, the user demographic is completely different. There is a much younger generation utilizing Twitter than the generation utilizing newspapers. As a result, pop culture and sports come into play much more as Twitter’s trending hashtags.  However, traditional news entities still see the value in Twitter as evidenced above. They realize that it can help generate traffic to their websites by posting headlines and article links. People can see these topics immediately on pretty much any current mobile device. This allows for emergency messages from news groups and other entities (like FEMA) to be relayed instantly to the public. Twitter is also credited for adding to the validity of the news, due to “crowdsourcing.” This means that a person can read about the same topic from many people and not have to rely on a Google algorithm or a single potentially biased news source. 
            Overall, the agendas of legacy media and Twitter are very different but also similar in a few ways. Legacy media stands to inform the public, but it ends up scaring it and putting too much emphasis on certain topics. More biased forms may try to indirectly control people. The purpose of Twitter is to get people to communicate, by sharing their opinions and experiences. The more traffic it receives, the more it can sell promoted tweets and trends to private companies. Both forms of media are common in the way they make money, through traffic (be it the website visitors, paper circulations, or TV ratings), which allows them to sell advertisements. I believe that Twitter is here to stay and will continue to innovate for years to come.

Works Cited
CNN. Cable News Network, n.d. Web. 24 June 2012. <http://www.CNN.com/US/>.
CNN. Cable News Network, n.d. Web. 24 June 2012. <http://www.CNN.com/WORLD/>.
"How Mainstream Media Outlets Use Twitter." Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ). N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2012. <http://www.journalism.org/node/27311>.
"Keiths.blog." Twitter vs. News : How Twitter Is Chaging the News. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 June 2012. <http://www.keithrozario.com/2011/07/twitter-vs-news-how-they-reported-the-oslo-bombing.html>.
The New York Times. The New York Times, n.d. Web. 24 June 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/index.html>.
The New York Times. The New York Times, n.d. Web. 24 June 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/pages/world/index.html>.
Twitter Study - August 2009. Pear Analytics, n.d. Web. <http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf>. 

No comments:

Post a Comment